AGM Belief Revision in Monotone Modal Logics

نویسنده

  • Gregory Wheeler
چکیده

Classical modal logics, based on the neighborhood semantics of Scott and Montague, provide a generalization of the familiar normal systems based on Kripke semantics. This paper defines AGM revision operators on several first-order monotonic modal correspondents, where each first-order correspondence language is defined by Marc Pauly’s version of the van Benthem characterization theorem for monotone modal logic. A revision problem expressed in a monotone modal system is translated into first-order logic, the revision is performed, and the new belief set is translated back to the original modal system. An example is provided for the logic of Risky Knowledge that uses modal AGM contraction to construct counter-factual evidence sets in order to investigate robustness of a probability assignment given some evidence set. A proof of correctness is given.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Revision by Translation

In this paper, we show that it is possible to accomplish belief revision in any logic which is translatable to classical logic. We start with the example of the propositional modal logic K and show that a belief operation in K de ned in terms of K0s translation to classical logic veri es the AGM postulates. We also consider the case of non-classical logics by taking Belnap's four-valued logic [...

متن کامل

AGM Revision in Classical Modal Logics

AGM-style revision operators are defined for several systems of classical modal logic. · · · draft of November 28, 2009 · · · Within AGM, consistency maintenance is done by classical logic. But the reliance on classical consistency presents a problem for exporting AGM revision to non-classical logics in general, and to modal logic in particular. A general technique for solving this problem is t...

متن کامل

Belief revision in a temporal framework

We study a branching-time temporal logic of belief revision where the interaction of belief and information is modeled explicitly. The logic is based on three modal operators: a belief operator, an information operator and a next-time operator. We consider three logics of increasing strength. The …rst captures the most basic notion of minimal belief revision. The second characterizes the qualit...

متن کامل

Yet More Modal Logics of Preference Change and Belief Revision

We contrast Bonanno’s ‘Belief Revision in a Temporal Framework’ [15] with preference change and belief revision from the perspective of dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). For that, we extend the logic of communication and change of [11] with relational substitutions [8] for preference change, and show that this does not alter its properties. Next we move to a more constrained context where belief a...

متن کامل

Belief Change in Branching Time: AGM-consistency and Iterated Revision

We study belief change in the branching-time structures introduced in [4]. First, we identify a property of branching-time frames that is equivalent to AGM-consistency, which is defined as follows. A frame is AGM-consistent if the partial belief revision function associated with an arbitrary state-instant pair and an arbitrary model based on that frame can be extended to a full belief revision ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010